Regulatory – start with the question you will be asked at the end
At the end of development, you will be stuck with a very simple question: Is this enough? Enough evidence for approval, for CE marking, for reimbursement, for further funding, or for the next clinical phase? By thoroughly digging into and defining the regulatory end goal (e.g. claims, approval pathway, clinical evidence requirements) from the start, and working backwards, your chances of a future “yes” to this simple question increases.
Working backwards makes regulatory interactions more effective. Scientific advice meetings, interactions with notified bodies and all documentation are planned around what you ultimately need to demonstrate. With 300+ ongoing projects within regulatory, we are reminded daily of the impact that the early choices have, across both drug and device development.
Clinical – start with the question
A clinical study can run perfectly and still answer the wrong question. Defining the claim the study must support might sound easy, yet it represents the main challenge. The right population, endpoints, the statistics foundations, aligned with regulatory and commercial expectations, are derived from that. Backwards planning also keeps patient safety, ethics, CMC, GMP manufacturing and scale-up integrated from the start, not managed retrospectively.
With our own clinical units in Turku and Helsinki, and the way we love to link expertise, clinical development becomes a continuation of development work rather than a handover. Regulatory, CMC, nonclinical, and clinical teams work together, linking phases and people so each study delivers data that answers – the right question.